NACDA
NACDL
Avvo Rating 10.0 - Top Attorney Criminal Defense
Avvo Rating 10.0 - Top Attorney Federal Crime
Avvo Rating 10.0 - Top Attorney Military Law
Avvo Rating 10.0 - Top Attorney Litigation
The Chicago Bar Association
Illinois State Bar Association
IICLE
American Bar Foundation
Attorney Client Satisfaction

The Fourth Amendment’s Sliding Scale Protection

Rosenblat Law Team
gun-and-bullets-1146529-s

Chicago – On a Sunday night in Chicago around Armitage and Kildare and Wabansia and Karlov the Chicago Police received numerous 911 calls reporting gunshots in the area. The callers reported to 911 hearing between 5 and 9 shots and based on additional 911 calls that the shots were fired from a black car traveling south on Karlov nears Wabansia.

The traffic was light, and two Chicago Police officers on patrol drove to Kostner and proceeded south. Kostner is a few blocks west of Karlov. The officers drove past a black car heading north and officers turned around and followed the black car. The Chicago Police officers stopped the car a short distance later. The officers approached the car and found a revolver on the passenger seat of the defendant, which had 5 of the six round fired.

The Defendant, a convicted felon, was charged with possessing a firearm as a convicted felon. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

The Defendant filed a motion to suppress the gun arguing that the Chicago Police officers lacked reasonable suspicion to justify the stop of the car. The District Court judge denied the Defendant’s motion to suppress and the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed.

The Seventh Circuit explained that the reasonableness of the stop is based on the totality of the circumstances, and that a number of circumstances, besides just being close to the reports of shots being fired distinguished this case from others. The Court noted on several occasions that this was a dangerous situation and applied a sliding scale under the greater the danger the less suspicion needed for a reasonable seizure and search. The court found that the dangerousness of the crime, the lack of time between the calls to 911 and the stop of the car, the distance between the locations reported of shots fired, the car’s color, and the light traffic, justified the stop of Defendant’s car.

See, United States v. Burgess, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13774 (July 17, 2014)

For more information see Rosenblatlaw.com

Our Offices

Northbrook Office
707 Skokie Blvd #600A

Northbrook, IL 60062

Chicago Office
111 W Jackson Blvd #1700a

Chicago, IL 60604

By Appointment Only

Client Reviews

I would like to say Mr. Rosenblat is without a doubt well respected . He took on a difficult case and represented me with honor. I'm forever grateful for what he's done. His due diligence in the matter ensured...

Jasper

Mike is an incredibly effective attorney. I was pleased with how responsive he was to my needs, even responding to my emails and phone calls on the weekend. He handled my situation professionally and everything...

Chrys

Attorney Rosenblat was exceedingly competent, diligent and attentive to my sensitive legal matter, which he resolved with aplomb. I am grateful for his professionalism and would highly encourage others to...

Yevgeniy

Mike is a excellent lawyer I had two cases pending mike got them both dismissed. He knows what he doing and does it well.

Andrew

In my lifetime I have come across many attorneys and none have compared to the level of professionalism and diligence of Michael Rosenblat. This man literally saved my life and I owe him eternal gratitude for...

Boris
The Supreme Court building

Contact Us We’re Here to Help You

Fill out the form or call us at (847) 480-2390 to schedule your consultation.